Impressing a Customer
Every market has its unique flavor, Japan stands out as a challenge and opportunity in equal measure for global brands seeking to impress a discerning Japanese customer audience. A Japan nuanced approach to branding is not just advisable; it’s imperative.
Japan, a nation steeped in rich culture and tradition, possesses a substantial consumer landscape shaped by distinct regional preferences and culturally bound behaviors. Navigating the country requires careful planning and the same is true for the consumer terrain. To be successful you need to do more than just introduce a product you need to have a comprehensive understanding of the Japanese consumer mindset.
The significance of effective regional branding cannot be overstated. It’s not merely about showcasing the product; it’s about weaving a narrative that resonates deeply with the Japanese consumer psyche.
A matter of trust
One of the key hurdles faced by international brands in Japan is the inherent distrust that consumers harbor for non-domestic products. Japanese consumers, with their high scores on Hofstede’s Uncertainty Avoidance Index, exhibit a natural aversion to risk, especially when it comes to lesser-known brands. Hence, to gain their trust, a brand must not only offer quality and competitive pricing but also craft a holistic brand experience tailored to local tastes and expectations.
Psychologist Dr. Geert Hofstede published the first edition of the cultural dimensions model at the end of the 1970s. It was based on research of people who worked for IBM in more than 50 countries. Hofstede is recognized as one of the most prominent theorists of the day, with significant influence in the field of intercultural communication, in particular.
Hofstede’s Culture’s Consequences first edition was published in 1980 and translated into 17 languages. At the same time, there was a dramatic increase in the number of studies on culture in business journals, and a total of 500 journals were published in the 1980s, increasing to 1700 publications in the 1990s, and 2200 publications in the 2000s according to Cheryl Nakata, in “Beyond Hofstede: Culture frameworks for global marketing and management“.
Of note, is the fact that the data was based upon surveys of thousands of respondents from many countries. More than 88,000 employees from 72 countries participated in the survey in 2001. In 2010 a follow-up survey recorded respondents from 93 countries.
While the initial research was IBM-centric, the framework’s applicability and usefulness led to its adoption in a broader range of research settings. Researchers have adapted the methodology to explore cultural dimensions among different groups of people, making the framework a valuable tool for cross-cultural analysis in diverse contexts.
One could argue that a shortcoming of the studies is that the samples are limited to a specific group of people who could be categorized as coming from a well-educated elite of business people. Such people might be considered atypical in any country.
Nonetheless, the model is an internationally recognized standard for understanding cultural differences.
According to Hofstede’s model, Japan scores high in masculinity, uncertainty avoidance, and long-term orientation compared to other Asian countries. However, Japan scores relatively low in power distance, individualism, and indulgence. Japan’s relatively low score in power distance indicates that Japanese people are more likely to question authority and expect equal distribution of power in society.
In the paper “How Foreigners Experience Japan: Beyond Hofstede’s Model” Akiko Asai discusses how the experience of foreigners from East Asia in Japan differs from that of other foreigners.
The fundamental message of Asai’s paper is that the experience of foreigners in Japan is not monolithic and cannot be explained by Hofstede’s cultural dimensions alone.
Asai argues that while Hofstede’s model is useful for understanding cultural differences, it has limitations and cannot fully capture the complexity of cross-cultural interactions. The author proposes instead, a more nuanced approach that takes into account factors such as language, ethnicity, and nationality even though at face value one is dealing simply with consumers in the Japanese market.
From all this, we could say that we have some sort of a sense of what factors might influence a brand’s positioning in the Japanese market but as with many things, absolutes do not necessarily hold steadfast.
learn more at
https://www.pretectum.com/impressing-a-customer/
