Search for:
Apr 26 2024
In life, generally old keys cannot open new doors


To progress and achieve new goals, we must let go of old mindsets, habits, and behaviours that no longer serve us.

Holding onto our past experiences and some historical knowledge can hinder our growth and keep us stuck in familiar but unfulfilling behavioural and mindset patterns. As one evolves and matures and takes on new challenges, one should adapt one’s approach accordingly.

As the saying suggests, trying to use the same “keys” from the past to unlock the doors of the future can be very frustrating and even futile.

To open new doors of opportunity, work, and endeavour, one must be willing to sometimes embrace radical change and embrace new ways of thinking and acting. This may require completely unlearning some of our old and potentially limiting beliefs about ourselves, those around us, and their and our potential. We should not let yesterday’s experiences and mindset dictate today’s possibilities.

Discarding the “dead weight” of a bunch of old keys that jangle our lives, creates cognitive and emotional space for the new keys we need to succeed. This discard could mean breaking old habits, ending toxic relationships and associations, or adopting a fresh perspective.

This all takes work, but the potential rewards in terms of personal growth and new opportunities often make it very worthwhile. The key is to focus on the new vision you have for your life, and take small daily actions to make it a reality.

Swapping out unproductive habits for ones that serve your goals with growth integral to your mindset, accompanied by a consistent effort can often open doors to a better future.

To embark upon this change is not easy, but it may well be necessary for your growth and to release you from being stuck in a rut or dissatisfied with your current circumstances. If these characteristics encumber your daily life, then it’s a sign that it’s time to let go of the old and embrace the new.

It’s important to take an honest look at one’s life and identify the areas that need improvement. Dead-end job, unfulfilling relationship, bad habits? Once we pinpoint the issues, we can start to develop a plan for change.

Letting Go

One of the biggest obstacles to change is our attachment to the past. Humans by their very nature are mostly nostalgic and sentimental.

Nostalgia is such a common human experience, with most people reflecting on the past as often as once a week, according to some studies.  This involves sentimentally longing or having an affection for the past, typically for a period or place with happy personal associations. This is often triggered by something reminding an individual of a positive experience from the past, such as songs, smells, photographs, or loneliness. Often it is characterized by bittersweet or even painful memories of the past.

The most nostalgic of us do tend to have certain personality traits, such as daydreaming frequently, being sentimental, overthinking, romanticizing the past, and not liking change. Nostalgia peaks during transitional age ranges like the teens through 20s and over 50. This nostalgia can have both positive and negative effects, positively boosting one’s mood, increasing self-esteem, providing a sense of social support, and helping one cope with difficult life transitions. Excessive nostalgia and dwelling too much on the past may have corrosive negative consequences.

We may cling to old habits, relationships, or beliefs because they feel comfortable and familiar. However, this attachment can prevent us from moving forward and reaching our full potential. It’s important to acknowledge that the past is gone and that we can’t change it but what we can change is our perspective on it.

Instead of viewing the past as a burden, we can see it as a learning experience that has shaped us into who we are today. Letting go of the past, we create space for new opportunities and experiences. We free ourselves from the weight of old baggage and can focus on the present moment and the future.

Growth and Rewards

To open new doors in life, we need to adopt a growth mindset.

This means embracing challenges, learning from mistakes, and continuously striving for improvement.A growth mindset allows us to see obstacles as opportunities for growth rather than roadblocks. When we face a challenge, we can approach it with curiosity and a willingness to learn rather than fear and resistance.Developing a growth mindset also requires us to be receptive to feedback and criticism despite it being hard to hear and accept. That feedback can provide valuable insights into areas where we can improve and inform our growth, we can accelerate our progress and open new doors more quickly with new keys.

Change is tied to action, so it’s not enough to simply think about the changes we want to make; we need to take concrete steps to make them happen – one way is with setting clear goals for ourselves. Understanding where we want to go and what we want to achieve. Understanding what we think success looks like. By setting specific, measurable goals, we can create our own personal roadmap for growth to help us stay focused on the path ahead.

Another important action is to develop a support system; seeking out supportive friends, family, or mentors who can make a difference in terms of providing emotional support and perhaps other kinds of support too. These people can provide encouragement, advice, and accountability as we work towards our goals.

Finally, it’s important to celebrate one’s progress and successes along the way; since change is a journey, it’s important to acknowledge the small wins that keep us motivated and inspired and celebrate our achievements, from which we can build momentum and stay focused on the bigger picture.


Read More
Author: Clinton Jones

Red Button 0 Comments
Jan 18 2024
January is a hunt for work month


If there is one thing that the recent shake-up in the employment market has brought home to many, especially those in tech, it is that work as traditionally understood by many of previous generations, can be unstable. Late in 2023 TikTok’s parent company, ByteDance, dismissed about 1,000 employees in its gaming unit. Fortnite developer Epic Games parted ways with over 800 personnel and Unity has continued a spree that started in 2023 and runs into 2024. The estimates for 2023 are 9000 people impacted in the gaming entertainment sector alone.

I always find a look at layoffs.fyi kind of interesting, they have been around a couple of years now with data going back to 2020. Frontdesk, Invision, Twitch, Lazada, Citrix, Audible, Flipkart Trend Micro, Unity, New Work SE, Google. Some of the numbers are substantial. As of today, 51 Tech companies and 7528 known layoffs in 2024 alone.

The recent changes in the employment market have highlighted the instability of traditional work structures. This has been particularly evident in the tech industry but it is not isolated to tech.

Several factors contribute to this shift:

  • High job openings: Despite a slight decrease in November, job openings in the US remain high by historical standards. This indicates a strong demand for workers.
  • Job market resilience: The US economy added more jobs than expected, demonstrating the resilience in the labor market.
  • Inflation and interest rates: The Federal Reserve has raised its benchmark interest rate multiple times to combat inflation, which has led to a gradual decline in job openings since peaking in March 2022. This could potentially lead to a cooling of the job market. In Europe, inflation dogged many European countries in 2022 and 2023 falling to 3.1% in the EU and 4.7% in the UK
  • Occupational Shift: occupational mixes shifted, with the most highly skilled individuals enjoying the strongest job growth over the last decade, while middle-skill workers had fewer opportunities.
  • Geographic Concentration: Employment growth in general has been concentrated in a handful of regions.
  • Labor Mobility: Labor mobility in the EU has been rising as workers in the lower-income regions migrate to dynamic cities to fill jobs.
  • COVID-19 Impact: The COVID-19 pandemic led to a decrease in national employment rates for 23 of the EU Member States in 2020 compared with the previous year. In the US, the COVID-19 pandemic led to significant job losses, but many of these jobs have since been restored.
  • Fake Work: According to Fortune, some companies reportedly hired people simply to snub competitors and neutralize the likelihood of those valued resources being snatched up by them. What they described as also being “thanks to an over-hiring spree to satisfy the “vanity” of bosses at the likes of Meta and Alphabet“.

These factors all lead to a reevaluation of traditional employment models, with many individuals and companies now exploring more flexible and resilient alternatives. This includes remote work, contract-based roles, and a greater emphasis on skills rather than specific job titles.

It’s a complex issue with many facets, and the job market will evolve in response to these and other pressures.

Organizations, much like living organisms, undergo cycles of growth and contraction influenced by economic conditions. During economic upturns, companies often seize expansion opportunities, hiring more talent to meet increased demands.

This growth phase can lead to a sense of abundance and optimism within the workforce. Conversely, economic downturns may prompt organizations to reassess their structures, resulting in layoffs, restructuring, or a more streamlined approach to operations.

Individual contributors must recognize these patterns to better navigate the shifts in their work environments. Understanding that these changes are often not personal but strategic responses to economic realities can provide a valuable perspective. By staying attuned to the broader organizational context, individuals can position themselves to adapt and contribute effectively during periods of change.

People-to-Manager Ratio

The people-to-manager ratio is a critical aspect of organizational dynamics. This ratio influences the effectiveness of management and the well-being of individual contributors. While there’s no universal formula for the perfect ratio, finding the right balance is essential.

In scenarios where the ratio is too high, individual contributors may feel a lack of guidance or support, leading to burnout and diminished performance. On the other hand, an excessively low ratio might result in micromanagement and hinder autonomy.

Organizations that strike the right balance empower managers to provide meaningful support to their teams while ensuring that individual contributors have the autonomy and resources needed to excel in their roles. This balance fosters a healthy work environment where everyone can thrive.

Imposter Syndrome

Imposter syndrome is a common challenge that individual contributors, especially very competent younger people, and women in particular, may face. This is prevalent, particularly during times of organizational change. It involves persistent feelings of inadequacy and a fear of being exposed as a fraud, despite evidence of competence or clear qualification.

To overcome imposter syndrome, one should actively reflect on achievements, skills, and the unique perspectives one brings to the role. Seeking constructive feedback from colleagues and mentors can provide valuable insights into one’s strengths. Acknowledging accomplishments, no matter how small helps build confidence and dispel the irrational belief of being an imposter. Watch out for gaslighters though.

In the face of organizational shifts, individuals need to recognize their intrinsic value. Understanding that you were hired for a reason and have the skills to contribute meaningfully can be a powerful antidote to any imposter syndrome you may suffer from.

Professional Growth

Regular self-assessment is a cornerstone of professional growth.

Individual contributors should evaluate their roles in the broader organizational context, considering how their work aligns with overarching goals. This involves a critical examination of tasks, responsibilities, and the impact of their contributions.

An effective self-evaluation goes beyond job responsibilities; it delves into the quality of work, initiative, and the ability to collaborate with colleagues. By identifying areas for improvement and actively seeking growth opportunities, individuals position themselves as proactive contributors to the organization’s success.

This reflective process allows individuals to align their goals with the organization’s objectives, ensuring that their contributions remain relevant and valuable, even in the face of organizational changes.

Reinvention of the self

In times of uncertainty, like now, the ability to reinvent oneself becomes a strategic advantage. This reinvention can take various forms, including acquiring new knowledge, adapting behaviors to meet evolving challenges, and delivering tangible results.

Continuous learning is another cornerstone of professional development. If we end up with more than four cornerstones, consider that the building that is your occupation, career, and role, may not be a quadrilateral.

We should all actively seek opportunities to acquire new skills, stay informed about industry trends, and engage in relevant training programs. This not only enhances individual capabilities but also contributes to the organization’s overall resilience.

Adapting behaviors involves staying attuned to evolving workplace dynamics. This may include embracing collaborative technologies, refining communication skills, and fostering a mindset of adaptability. Being open to change and displaying a positive attitude can position you as an asset during times of organizational flux.

Delivering tangible results is also a fundamental aspect of proving one’s value. Individual contributors should focus on outcomes, highlighting achievements and the positive impact of work. This may involve setting measurable goals, taking ownership of projects, and consistently delivering high-quality results that contribute to the organization’s success.

Critical Thinking

Critical thinking is a catalyst for innovation and problem-solving. Those who cultivate such a skill can navigate uncertainties with agility. During periods of organizational change, critical thinking involves strategic analysis, identifying potential challenges, and proposing effective solutions.

Proactive engagement in critical thinking demonstrates leadership qualities. Individual contributors should actively participate in discussions, offer insights, and contribute to decision-making processes. This not only showcases value but positions one as an essential contributor to the organization’s resilience and adaptability.

Critical thinking involves anticipating future trends and challenges. By staying ahead of the curve, you can position yourself as a more valuable asset, contributing to the organization’s ability to navigate changing economic climates.

Good luck otherwise with the current storm that we seem to be sailing through and hope for calmer waters soon, but hopefully not so calm that you get bored.


Read More
Author: Clinton Jones

Red Button 0 Comments
Jan 13 2024
Data Governance playbooks for 2024


Back in 2020, I offered up some thoughts for consideration around generic or homogenous data governance playbooks. Revisit it if you care to.

This was in part fueled by frustrations with the various maturity models and potential frameworks available but also by the push, particularly from some software vendors, to suggest that a data governance program could be relatively easily captured and implemented generically using boiler-plated scenarios by any organization without necessarily going through the painful process of analysis, assessment and design.

Of course, there is the adage, “Anything worth doing, is worth doing well“, and that remains a truism as applicable to a data governance program as anything else in the data management space.

You can’t scrimp on the planning and evaluation phase if you want to get your data governance program to be widely adopted and effective irrespective of how many bucks you drop and irrespective of the mandates and prescripts yelled from the boardroom.

Like any change program, a DG initiative needs advocacy and design appropriate to the context and no vendor is going to do that perfectly well for you without you making a significant investment of time, people and effort to get the program running. If you’re evaluating a software vendor to do this for you, in particular, you need to be sure to check out their implementation chops and assess their domain knowledge, particularly relevant to your industry sector, market and organizational culture. This is a consulting focus area that “The Big Four” have started to look more closely at and are competing with boutique consultancies on. So if you have a passion for consulting and you feel all the big ERP and CRM projects have been done and you want to break into this space, then here is an area to consider.

What is it exactly?

The term “playbook” in a business context is borrowed from American football. In sports, a playbook is often a collection of a team’s plays and strategies, all compiled and organized into one book or binder. Players are expected to learn “the plays” and ahead of the game the coach and team work out the play that they are likely to run at the opposing team or the approach that they will use if the opposing team is observed to run a particular play of their own. Some plays may be offensive, some defensive and then there may be other plays for specialised tactical runs at a given goal or target.

A “business playbook” contains all your company’s processes, policies, and standard operating procedures (SOPs). Also termed a “company playbook”, it is effectively a manual outlining how your business does what it does, down to each business operations role, responsibility, business strategy, and differentiator. This should be differentiated from a RunBook where the latter is your “go-to” if a team needs step-by-step instructions for certain tasks. Playbooks have a broader focus and are great for teams that need to document more complex processes. It is a subtlety that is appreciated more when you are in the weeds of the work than when you are talking or thinking conceptually about new ways of optimizing organizational effectiveness and efficiency.

A data governance playbook is then effectively a library of documented processes and procedures that describe each activity in terms of the inputs and capture or adoption criteria, the processes to be completed, who would be accountable for which tasks, and the interactions required. It also often outlines the deliverables, quality expectations, data controls, and the like.

Under the US President’s management agenda, the federal Data Strategy offers up a Data Governance Playbook that is worth taking a look at as an example. Similarly, the Health IT Playbook is a tool for administrators, physician practice owners, clinicians and practitioners, practice staff, and anyone else who wants to leverage health IT. The focus is on the protection and security of patient information and ensuring patient safety.

So, in 2024, if you’re just picking up the concept of a playbook, and a data governance playbook in particular, it is likely that you’ll look at what the software vendors have in mind; you’ll evaluate a couple of implementation proposals from consultants and you’ll consider repurposing something from adjacent industry, a past project or a comparable organization.

Taking a “roll-your-own” approach

There’s plenty of reading content out there from books written by industry practitioners, and analysts, to technology vendors, as mentioned. Some are as dry as ditchwater and very few get beyond a first edition, although some authors have been moderately successful at pushing out subsequent volumes with different titles. A lot of the content though, will demonstrate itself to be thought exercises with examples, things/factors to consider, experiences and industry or context-specific understandings or challenges. Some will focus on particular functionality or expectations around the complementary implementation or adoption of particular technologies.

With the latest LLM and AI/ML innovations, you’ll also discover a great deal of content. Many of these publications, articles and posts found across the internet have already been parsed and assimilated into the LLM engines so, a good starting point is for you to ask your favourite chatbot what it thinks.

Using a large language model (LLM) like ChatGPT to facilitate the building of data playbooks might be feasible to a certain extent but there will be challenges.

On the plus-side. An LLM could generate content and provide templates for various sections of a data playbook, such as data classification, access controls, data lifecycle management, and compliance. It can also assist in drafting policy statements, guidelines, and procedures.

It could help in explaining complex data governance concepts, definitions, and best practices in a more accessible language for use in say a business glossary or thesaurus. This could be beneficial for individuals who might not have a deep understanding of data governance – think about your data literacy campaigning in this context.

Users can also directly interact with an LLM in a question-answer format to seek clarity on specific aspects of data governance and help build an understanding of key data governance concepts and data management requirements.

Just as for generic playbooks, there are going to be problems with this approach, LLMs operate based on patterns learned from a diverse range of data, but they often lack domain specificity. A data management platform or data catalog itself might have an LLM attached to it but has it been trained with data governance practice content?

Data governance often requires an understanding of industry-specific regulations, data types, and organizational contexts that might not be captured adequately by a generic model.

We’ve also heard about AI hallucinations, and some of us may have even experienced a chatbot hallucination. Without the particular character of data governance practice and domain knowledge, there’s a risk that the AI might generate content that is wholly or partially inaccurate, incomplete, or not aligned with the actual organizational need. This then, would have you second-guessing the results and having to dig into the details to ensure that the suggested content is appropriate. You’ll need to have a domain expert on hand to validate the machine-generated output.

Data governance practices and regulations are also ever-evolving. What the LLM might not be aware of, is new regulations, new compliance expectations or new industry standards. So leaning purely on machine-generated content may be deficient in revealing emerging best practices unless it gets to be trained with updates.

Each organization has its unique culture, structure, and processes. The intertwined nature of DG with the various organizational processes, and understanding these interconnections is vital; that’s best achieved with careful analysis, process design and domain knowledge. The tool you use to help elaborate your playbook might simply provide information in isolation, without any grasp of the broader organizational context. Without appropriate training and prompting, the specific nuances of the organization will make it almost impossible to tailor the generated content to align with organizational goals and practices.

I guess my whole point is that you will not escape the human factor. If you insist on going it alone and relying on machine-generated content in particular then that same content should undergo thorough validation by domain experts and organizational stakeholders to ensure that the results are accurate and aligned with organizational and industry requirements.

The use of modern-day tooling to assist human experts in drafting and refining data playbooks is a valuable acceleration approach that has merit but just as for generic playbooks and templates, you need to leverage the strengths of canned, automated generation and human expertise to arrive at a good result.

I’d love to hear what if anything you’ve done with chatbots, AI, ML and LLM to generate content. If you are implementing any data management or data governance initiatives, I would love to know how successful you have been and any tips or tricks you acquired along the way.


Read More
Author: Clinton Jones

Red Button 0 Comments
Sep 16 2023
Intelligence


Intelligence is a multifaceted and complex concept that has intrigued intellectuals for centuries. Its definition, measurement, and understanding have evolved over time, and it continues to be a subject of debate and research.

Can it be viewed as a product, a process, content, or style? Why it is often described as encompassing all of these aspects?

Intelligence as a Product

One way to think about intelligence is as a product, an outcome, or a result of cognitive processes. This perspective is often associated with the idea of intelligence quotient (IQ) and standardized intelligence tests. IQ tests are designed to measure a person’s cognitive abilities and compare them to a standardized population and the distribution across that population. Scores on such tests are often considered a product of one’s intellectual abilities.

IQ tests, such as the Stanford-Binet or Wechsler Adult Intelligence Scale, are designed to assess a range of cognitive abilities, including logical reasoning, problem-solving, verbal comprehension, and mathematical skills. The scores derived from these tests are used to classify individuals into categories of intellectual ability, such as “average,” “above average,” or “below average.”

The product-oriented view of intelligence involves assigning numerical scores to individuals based on their performance on these standardized tests. This scoring allows for the comparison of individuals’ cognitive abilities, and it can be used for various practical purposes, such as educational placement and job selection.

However, it’s important to recognize the limitations of this perspective; standardized tests may not capture the full spectrum of human cognitive abilities, and they can be influenced by cultural and socioeconomic factors. They also do not account for other important aspects of intelligence, such as creativity, emotional intelligence, or practical problem-solving skills.

Intelligence as a Process

Intelligence is not static, it is dynamic and ever-evolving. If you take this perspective there is an emphasis on the cognitive activities and mental processes involved in thinking, learning, and problem-solving. From this viewpoint, intelligence is the ability to adapt to new situations, acquire knowledge, and make informed decisions.

Intelligence as a process encompasses a wide range of cognitive processes, including memory, perception, attention, reasoning, and problem-solving. These processes work together to enable individuals to gather information, process it, and use it to make decisions.

Intelligence also involves the capacity to learn from experience and adapt to changing circumstances. It is not solely determined by innate abilities but is influenced by factors such as education, exposure to new ideas, and the ability to apply knowledge effectively.

Viewing intelligence as a process also allows for an understanding of its development over one’s life. Children may develop cognitive skills at different rates, and most adults can continue to learn and adapt throughout their lives.

Recognizing intelligence as a process has practical implications for education and training. Effective teaching methods should consider the cognitive processes involved in learning and adapt instruction accordingly.

Intelligence as Content

Intelligence includes the content of knowledge and information that we possess at a point in time. This aspect of intelligence relates to what one knows and understands about the world. However, having knowledge alone does not necessarily equate to intelligence; intelligence also involves the ability to use and apply that knowledge practically and effectively.

The content-oriented perspective of intelligence acknowledges that individuals differ in the depth and breadth of their knowledge. Some people may have extensive knowledge in specific domains, such as mathematics, history, and art, while others may have a more general knowledge base.

Intelligence can be domain-specific, meaning that an individual may excel in one area of knowledge but not in others. For example, a person could be highly knowledgeable about music but less knowledgeable about science; this doesn’t make them particularly more or less intelligent, the assessment largely depends on what they are being assessed against and for what purpose.

Intelligence is not just about what one knows, therefore, but also about how effectively you can apply that knowledge to solve problems, make decisions, and navigate real-world situations. This ability to apply knowledge is a crucial aspect of practical intelligence.

Intelligence as Style

Cognitive styles refer to individual differences in how people approach and process information. Styles can be considered as aspects of intelligence because they influence how individuals think, learn, and solve problems. Different cognitive styles can be seen as different approaches to using one’s cognitive abilities.

The Analytical vs. Creative is an interesting way to think about style as some individuals have an analytical cognitive style, characterized by a preference for systematic and logical thinking. Others may have a creative cognitive style, which involves generating novel ideas and thinking outside the box. Both styles can be valuable in different contexts.

Another cognitive style relates to practical problem-solving. Some people may excel at finding efficient solutions to everyday challenges, the proverbial “MacGyver”, demonstrating a practical intelligence style. This is particularly valuable in real-world situations like sticky situations where coming up with imaginative ways to extricate oneself from the situation is essentially a show of intelligence.

Emotional intelligence is a distinct cognitive style that involves the ability to recognize, understand, and manage one’s own emotions and the emotions of others. This has become a very popular trait in the corporate world. Those who have high emotional intelligence are acknowledged as having an edge over those for whom the EQ is low. EQ plays a crucial role in social interactions and interpersonal relationships.

The “All Dimensions” intelligence

While each of these perspectives—intelligence as a product, process, content, and style—provides valuable insights into the nature of intelligence, it is essential to recognize that intelligence is complex and multidimensional. Intelligence cannot be fully captured by any one dimension alone. Instead, it is the integration of all or at least many of these dimensions; giving us a more comprehensive understanding of human intelligence.

A holistic view of intelligence acknowledges both cognitive abilities and the capacity to apply these abilities to real-world situations. Holistic assessment of intelligence recognizes that intelligence is not limited to a single aspect but involves a combination of cognitive processes, knowledge, cognitive styles, and practical problem-solving abilities.

Intelligence is highly context-dependent. What may be considered intelligent behavior in one situation may not be so in another. This contextual aspect of intelligence highlights the importance of adaptability and flexibility in using cognitive abilities effectively.

The variance among individuals, with some excelling in different aspects of intelligence witnesses the presence of some with superior analytical intelligence, while others are creative or practical. Recognizing and valuing these individual differences is crucial for fostering diversity and innovation especially when building teams.

Cultural and societal factors shape the way intelligence is defined and valued and certain aspects of intelligence are more highly valued over others, this leads to variations in what is considered “intelligent behaviour”.

Since intelligence is not fixed but can be developed and enhanced throughout one’s life, the educational and experiential opportunities offered to individuals often play a significant role in shaping and expanding an individual’s intelligence.


Read More
Author: Clinton Jones

Red Button 0 Comments
Feb 17 2023
The fast track to the Z-List


We’re probably all comfortable with the concept of an A-list celebrity, but what about the Z-Lister?

The concept of a Z-lister refers to a person who is considered to be at the very bottom of the celebrity hierarchy. These individuals are often seen as being irrelevant, unknown, or unimportant in the entertainment industry. They are typically not well-known outside of their niche area of expertise, and often struggle to maintain any kind of mainstream attention or recognition.

The term “Z-lister” is used to describe individuals who are typically ranked at the lowest level of celebrity status. This can include reality TV stars, social media influencers, or other minor celebrities who have limited influence or following. While some may have a small dedicated fanbase, they often lack the recognition and status of more established celebrities.

The concept of the Z-lister has become increasingly prevalent in the age of social media and reality TV, where it is easier than ever to become a public figure. With the rise of platforms like Instagram, TikTok, and YouTube, anyone can potentially gain a large following and some degree of notoriety. However, this also means that there is a much larger pool of aspiring celebrities, and it can be difficult to stand out from the crowd.

The term Z-lister can be seen as somewhat derogatory, as it implies that the individual in question is of little significance or importance. It can also be seen as a reflection of our celebrity-obsessed culture, where status and fame are highly prized, and those who fail to achieve these goals are often seen as losers or failures.

However, it is worth noting that not all Z-listers are unsuccessful or irrelevant.

Some may be highly successful within their niche area of expertise, and may have a dedicated fanbase or following. Others may be using their minor celebrity status as a stepping stone to greater success, or may simply enjoy the attention and recognition that comes with being a public figure.

Ultimately, the concept of the Z-lister is a reflection of the changing nature of fame and celebrity in the modern world.

While it is now easier than ever to gain a degree of public recognition, it is also harder than ever to stand out from the crowd and achieve lasting success.

The rise of social media and reality TV has created a vast and diverse landscape of celebrities, from A-listers to Z-listers and everything in between, and it is up to each individual to determine what level of fame and recognition they are comfortable with.


Read More
Author: Jewel Tan

Red Button 0 Comments