Search for:
Evolution of work: the office and home


I couldn’t help myself, I was so incensed by the latest article I read on the insistence of some execs that people return to the office, that I felt a compulsion to write something a little extended on the topic.

Few would dispute the suggestion that office work has undergone a remarkable transformation in the last couple of years, transitioning from rigid hierarchies and traditional cubicles to flexible, collaborative spaces that embrace remote work and digital communication.

The transformation has been driven by technological advancements, changing societal norms, and a reevaluation of the nature of work itself.

The history and nature of office work is a curiosity, if you were to explore the kinds of jobs associated with office environments you might even be surprised, if you analyze the shift away from the traditional office setting you start to recognise the implications for corporate culture, collaboration, and information security.

History
The concept of office work can be traced back to ancient civilizations where scribes and administrators maintained records and facilitated communication for rulers and governments. We often forget that clerical staff existed in the time of the Babylonians, the Pharaohs and the Emperors of Rome, and the Moghuls.

The modern office as we know it emerged only during the Industrial Revolution. With the rise of industrialization and the need for efficient administration, large corporations and government agencies established centralized offices to manage various tasks such as record-keeping, communication, and coordination.

1970s office

Women at work in the bookkeeping room at the Bank of America in 1970. 
Hulton Archive/Getty Images

By the mid-20th century, offices had become synonymous with rows of cubicles, typewriters, and paper files. The hierarchical structure was prominent, with managers overseeing clerical staff performing repetitive tasks. Communication was mostly face-to-face or conducted through interoffice memos.

Office work encompasses a wide range of roles across industries. Some of the typical office jobs include:

  • Administrative Assistants: These individuals provide administrative support, manage schedules, coordinate meetings, and handle correspondence.
  • Accountants and Finance Professionals: Responsible for managing financial records, budgeting, and preparing reports for the organization’s financial well-being.
  • Human Resources Personnel: Oversee recruitment, employee relations, benefits administration, and training programs.
  • Marketing and Sales Teams: Plan and execute marketing strategies, analyze customer data, and manage client relationships.
  • IT Professionals: Maintain the organization’s technological infrastructure, provide technical support, and ensure data security.
  • Project Managers: Coordinate tasks, timelines, and resources to ensure projects are executed efficiently.

There is a nice Indeed article that lays out a raft of once-associated office-bound occupations

All Change
The advent of technology, especially the internet, has brought about a significant shift in how work is done.

The rise of personal computers, email, and digital communication platforms redefined the traditional office space. The concept of remote work emerged, allowing employees to perform tasks from locations other than the physical office. Think “teleworkers”.

Many who still hold “office jobs” today witnessed a shift in their understanding of work-life balance. They sought more flexibility in their work arrangements, and employers recognized the benefits of remote work in attracting and retaining talent.

The COVID-19 pandemic accelerated this shift further, as many organizations were forced to swiftly transition to remote work to ensure business continuity.

Remote work not only offers employees the flexibility to balance personal and professional responsibilities but also reduces commute-related stress and expenses. Additionally, it allows organizations to tap into a global talent pool, leading to increased diversity and innovative thinking within teams.

However, remote work is not without its challenges. The lack of face-to-face interaction can hinder spontaneous collaboration, and feelings of isolation might affect employee morale. To overcome these challenges, organizations turn to digital collaboration tools, video conferencing, and project management platforms to foster communication and teamwork. People’s calendars now get filled up with potentially many more meetings.

Virtual team-building activities, online workshops, and regular check-ins help maintain a sense of community among remote workers. Organizations are also incorporating flexible work hours to accommodate different time zones and individual preferences, further enhancing employee satisfaction and well-being.

The shift toward remote work has also prompted a reevaluation of corporate culture (and expenditure). Traditional office cultures often focused on visible signs of productivity, such as time spent at a desk, rather than on outcomes. In contrast, remote work emphasizes results over mere presence. This change in focus should lead to a more results-oriented and trust-based work environment. But all this assumes that business leaders are actually focused on outcomes and are willing to measure and track outcomes and dare I say, even recognize what kind of outcomes they want to see. What is the baseline measure for productivity? Many can’t say for certain.

Focusing on Effectiveness
Productivity and effective communication often go hand in hand, it is quite obviously essential for any organization’s success what needs to be done, and how, should be communicated with clarity. It is equally important for team members to understand how they will be assessed and how they should self-assess.

The digital age has brought both opportunities and challenges and digital tooling facilitates quick communication but can also lead to information overload and misinterpretation.

It’s crucial for organizations to establish clear communication guidelines and encourage active listening and empathy, irrespective of whether employees are working remotely or in the office.

Clerical, administrative, and office work has moved squarely beyond the physical office but has brought another challenge front and center. That concern is ensuring information security.

Controlling information assets has become paramount. Remote work opens up new avenues for cyberattacks and data breaches. Organizations now have to invest in robust cybersecurity measures, including encryption, multi-factor authentication, and regular employee training on recognizing and responding to security threats.

Moonlighters
A further concern that has been raised, is principally focused on offshore workers, but it is as relevant on shire and near-shore too. The concern is about the potential for remote workers to engage in moonlighting activities.

Moonlighting refers to the practice of employees taking on additional jobs, often during their official work hours, without the knowledge or consent of their primary employer.

This phenomenon can lead to decreased productivity, compromised work quality, and conflicts of interest. Additionally, moonlighting might result in the leakage of sensitive company information to competitors or unauthorized parties. Addressing this risk is essential to maintain the integrity of remote work arrangements and uphold the organization’s values.

Clear Communication and Policies are the first steps in mitigating the risk of moonlighting. It requires clear communication regarding the organization’s policies.

It should include explicit clauses in employment contracts or remote work agreements that address moonlighting, specifying whether it’s allowed, prohibited, or requires prior approval. These policies should outline the potential consequences of engaging in unauthorized work during official work hours, emphasizing the importance of transparency and ethical behavior.

Organizations that implement robust performance metrics that allow managers to gauge remote workers’ productivity and work quality objectively will help.

Regular performance evaluations and goal-setting sessions can provide insights into an employee’s commitment and focus. When employees are held accountable for their output, they are more likely to prioritize their primary job responsibilities over moonlighting activities.

Cultivating a culture of trust and engagement within the organization is the fine line to walk here.

When employees feel valued and respected, they are less likely to seek external employment opportunities that might compromise their primary role. Encouraging open dialogue between managers and remote workers, allows them to voice any concerns or challenges they might be facing. This approach fosters a sense of belonging and reduces the temptation to engage in moonlighting.

Business leaders should also consider offering flexible work arrangements that accommodate employees’ personal needs and interests.

By allowing flexible work hours, employees may have the opportunity to pursue personal projects or interests outside of their primary role without resorting to moonlighting during official work hours. This can strike a balance between promoting individual growth and ensuring productivity.

The technology can also be used to monitor employee productivity and engagement during work hours, it can provide insights into how employees spend their time while working remotely. However, it’s important to use these tools transparently and ethically, respecting employees’ privacy and autonomy and of course respecting local laws.

Leaders that maintain regular check-ins and communication channels between managers and remote workers and who stay connected and informed about ongoing projects and challenges have the advantage.

Engaged managers can identify potential signs of moonlighting and address them proactively. These interactions also reinforce the organization’s commitment to maintaining high work standards.

Dealing with executive fear
Executives have long associated the visibility of their employees’ physical presence in the office with a sense of control, productivity, and the traditional markers of success.

However, focusing solely on the visibility of physical bodies is not conducive to fostering a thriving and innovative work environment. Execs should overcome their concerns about visibility and consider rethinking the nature of corporate offices.

Success is measured not by the number of hours an employee spends at their desk but by the results they achieve. Rigid adherence to physical presence can create a culture where employees prioritize appearing busy over-delivering meaningful outcomes. Execs who shift their focus to valuing tangible contributions rather than mere visibility encourage a more results-oriented approach among their teams.

I already mentioned flexible work arrangements, including remote and hybrid models. This demonstrates trust in employees’ ability to manage their work effectively regardless of their physical location. This trust, in turn, boosts employee morale, loyalty, and commitment to the organization. By allowing employees to balance work and personal responsibilities, executives show their dedication to employee well-being and work-life integration.

Rethinking the traditional office model allows organizations to tap into a diverse talent pool that might not be able to commute to a physical office location. Remote work and flexible arrangements open the doors to hiring individuals from different geographies, backgrounds, and perspectives. Diversity can drive innovation, creativity, and a broader range of ideas.

Redefining the nature of corporate offices can lead to cost savings related to office space, utilities, and facilities management. Such resources can be redirected toward investing in technology, employee development, and other areas that contribute to the organization’s growth and sustainability.

Execs should shift their perspective on corporate offices from being showcases of power and impressiveness to becoming hubs of collaboration, innovation, and employee well-being.

Rather than focusing on grandeur, consider designing office spaces that foster collaboration and teamwork. Create open and flexible workspaces that encourage spontaneous interactions, idea sharing, and cross-functional collaboration. These spaces can include communal areas, breakout rooms, and digital tools that facilitate virtual collaboration for remote team members.

Prioritize employee well-being by providing amenities that enhance their physical and mental health. Incorporate elements like ergonomic furniture, natural lighting, recreational spaces, and wellness programs. Execs who invest in employee well-being create an environment where employees feel valued and motivated to contribute their best.

Technology infusion throughout the office environment facilitates communication and enhances productivity. Video conferencing systems, interactive displays, and collaboration platforms connect teams across different locations and time zones. This approach ensures that both in-office and remote employees can participate in discussions and projects effectively and seamlessly.

Shifting the focus from measuring success based on office hours to evaluating outcomes and contributions and setting clear performance metrics that align with business goals and encourage employees, allows them to take ownership of their work. This approach empowers employees to demonstrate their value through tangible results.

Consider giving employees the ability to design their workdays and environments in ways that optimize their productivity and well-being. Allow them to choose when and where they work, within the boundaries of team collaboration and project deadlines. Execs who prioritize employee empowerment create a sense of ownership and accountability.

Remote work is here to stay, organizations need to reimagine their corporate culture, they need to foster collaboration across distances, and address the challenges of effective communication and information security.

The office is no longer bound by physical walls; it’s now a dynamic space where technology and human creativity intersect to shape the future of work.

By embracing these changes, organizations create a harmonious balance between tradition and innovation, leading to increased productivity, employee satisfaction, and success in the ever-evolving landscape of office work.


Read More
Author: Uli Lokshin

Nurturing a Culture of Empowerment for Innovation in Business Leadership


In my view, effective leadership involves empowering employees and fostering a culture of innovation amongst teams. This is particularly important in industry sectors that are bound up in imprecise ways to achieve both specific and vaguely specified outcomes. These may include technology and software development, entertainment and media, fashion and design, advertising and marketing, renewable energy, and sustainability.

The concept of autonomous yet thoughtful decision-making is a powerful leadership strategy that helps to drive desired productive outcomes. Many may understand the significance of autonomy and empowerment but not acknowledge the importance in various business settings.

This often means emphasizing the need for a shift away from very traditional command and control models (C&C). C&C is prevalent in more traditional and bureaucratic organizations it has often been associated with industries where standardization, efficiency, and compliance were crucial, such as military, manufacturing, and certain government sectors.

Some of the key characteristics of C&C include centralized decision-making where the decision-making power is concentrated in the hands of those at the top. This approach often leaves little room for input from the lower levels of employees. There’s a chain of command and decisions are typically passed down that chain.

A second common characteristic is the strictness of the hierarchy. Organizationally the structure is typically like a pyramid with clearly delineated lines of authority and control. Each level reports to the one above it, and instructions flow from the top down. There may be an emphasis on discipline and control to ensure that employees adhere to prescribed and somewhat predictable processes in order to meet performance expectations.

C&C is often characterized by rigid adherence to rules, procedures, and protocols. Employees are expected to follow specific guidelines as prescribed without deviation. In line with the pyramid, communication follows formal channels, such as through managers and supervisors and information or insights may be limited as the communication slows up and down the hierarchy. Everyone is assigned specific roles and responsibilities, and tasks are somewhat clearly defined. Employees have little autonomy to make decisions or exercise creativity. The focus is on carrying out assigned tasks as directed.

While this leadership model can be effective in certain circumstances as I previously described, it is often criticized for its limitations in an ambiguous, dynamic, and fluid business environment.

In industries that require adaptability, creativity, and innovation, like the tech sector, the command and control model in my experience, actually hinders employee engagement, limits the flow of ideas, and inhibits organizational agility. I am more in favor of participative and collaborative leadership that empowers employees and fosters a culture of innovation and a genuine desire for ownership and accountability.

Instead, I advocate for a more informal and relaxed, and collaborative leadership approach that encourages creativity and innovation where the leadership team functions as player-coaches and builds genuine consensus and collective agreement on big and small decisions through dialog and negotiation.

Growth through empowerment

If you want growth, then empowering employees goes beyond simple delegation; it requires trusting individuals to make informed decisions and providing them with the necessary resources and autonomy to act. In so doing you foster a sense of ownership and accountability within the workforce which then leads to higher job satisfaction and improved overall productivity.

The core of successful empowerment lies in striking the right balance between autonomy and thoughtful decision-making. You should want autonomous yet well-considered decision-making from your employees. Autonomy allows teams and individuals to leverage their expertise and creativity to address complex challenges effectively. However, it must be complemented with considered decision-making, where employees gather information, seek advice, and analyze potential outcomes before acting. Remember you’re paying these people for their expertise and to perform a particular job. If you’re only interested in barking instructions at them then you may as well just hire unskilled people with no particular specialisms or experience.

Tailoring empowerment models to your business settings is important since the universal benefits of empowerment and autonomy don’t necessarily manifest in all cultures or work settings. The application should therefore be tailored to suit the specific business contexts you have. There are a few different implementation models to consider. Task-based, Team-based, and Individualized

Task-based empowerment is typical for industries with routine tasks. Task-based empowerment can streamline processes and enhance productivity. By granting employees authority over specific responsibilities, business leaders enable them to make decisions related to their assigned tasks, boosting efficiency. Without disrupting efficiency and effectiveness, for example, employees can rotate and resequence their tasking according to their preferences and observed optimality.

Team-based empowerment is most appropriate in dynamic environments which ultimately benefit from improved collaboration and collective decision-making and where these activities take center stage. By allowing teams to pool diverse perspectives and expertise, leaders have the potential to tap into the opportunities afforded by collective innovation.

In roles requiring specialized skills, individual-based empowerment can be highly effective. Leaders empower subject matter experts to make decisions in their areas according to proficiency, fostering innovation and excellence in technology-driven fields. This is individual-based empowerment

C&C with its centralized decision-making and strict protocols works somewhat well in highly regulated industries, this approach stifles creativity though and limits adaptability in technology development. Employees may feel restricted, resulting in decreased motivation, innovation, and engagement.

Conversely, the informal and relaxed leadership style promotes open communication, trust, and collaboration. By empowering employees to make autonomous decisions, leadership fosters an essential culture of innovation and agility. This approach is particularly effective in software development and technology-driven operations, where creativity thrives in a flexible environment.

Getting the best out of teams and individuals

Getting the best out of the two quite different approaches still requires you to set clear objectives with agreed measurable outcomes. Empowering employees requires providing clear objectives and expectations. Well-defined goals using the SMART framework (Specific, Measurable, Achievable, Relevant, Time-bound) help individuals self-manage their work efficiently.

SMART goal setting

Another facet is effective time management; autonomy allows individuals to manage their own time. To be effective though, there needs to be discipline. Discipline is essential for ensuring its effective use. Encouraging employees to prioritize tasks, set deadlines, and avoid distractions maintains their productivity.

Autonomous employees must also be accountable for their work. Encouraging ownership and transparent progress reporting foster a sense of responsibility.

Self-Management in Project and Program Management

In technology development, adopting an agile methodology enhances self-management. Empowered teams self-organize, collaborate, and make quick decisions to adapt to changing requirements effectively.

Leaders can further empower teams by providing autonomy in decision-making. Open communication and input from team members drive a self-managed and collaborative environment.

Project management itself involves ongoing learning and improvement allowing employees to reflect on progress and take initiative. These empowering approaches support positive change and have a greater likelihood of driving success.

As already suggested, empowerment also requires balancing discipline with flexibility. Through research, it has been found that Innovation thrives in more flexible environments. Leaders must therefore be open to diverse methods and ideas, trusting teams to find effective solutions. Open channels of communication facilitate not only bidirectional trust, they also support employee self-management and lead to continuous improvement.

A few words of caution

Sometimes, in our earnest efforts to empower others and provide autonomy, we may inadvertently deceive ourselves into believing that we have relinquished command and control.

Despite statements of intent, the empowerment we claim to have granted is a self-deceiving illusion. We might unknowingly perpetuate a micro-management overreach by behaving in exactly the opposite way to what we suggest we are thinking. This can occur when we continuously bombard teams with questions, second-guess their independent decisions, and challenge their judgment with frequency. Individuals and teams need to occasionally fail to learn. While our intention may be to offer support and ensure success, our actions may inadvertently stifle creativity and autonomy.

True empowerment necessitates trust and allowing individuals the space to take ownership of their work is critical. Constantly questioning decisions sends mixed signals, who is actually making the decisions? Undermining the confidence of team leads and team members impedes their ability to innovate freely. To genuinely empower others, we must genuinely let go of control, offer guidance only when sought, celebrate their success, recognize missteps, and offer encouragement, coaching, and reassurance.

Occasional mistakes are part of the learning process. By fostering a culture of trust and granting autonomy, we can break free from the C&C mindset, unleashing the full potential of our teams to drive creativity and achieve remarkable results.

Nurturing a culture of empowerment is essential for fostering innovation in business leadership. By tailoring empowerment models to the specifics of the business setting and adopting informal leadership styles, leaders can cultivate creativity and adaptability, particularly in software development and technology-driven operations. Encouraging discipline and self-management in tasking and project and program management enables employees to thrive in an environment that values autonomy while maintaining focus and efficiency. Striking the right balance between discipline and flexibility empowers teams to innovate, drive success, and contribute to sustainable growth.

Suggested reading :


Read More
Author: Clinton Jones

Crossing the Data Divide: Closing Gaps in Perception of Data as Corporate Asset
It’s my great pleasure and honor to begin as a columnist for TDAN.com. TDAN.com has a long and distinguished record of giving voice to ideas in the data space and I will do my best to continue that tradition. The Crossing the Data Divide column will be aimed at data leaders. That is to say, […]


Read More
Author: John Wills

The “on the side” hustlers


In recent years, the trend of remote work has gained popularity, especially in the technology industry.

The advent of modern technology has seen certain kinds of employees no longer being required to be physically present in an office to perform their job functions.

This flexibility is praised by many as having benefits but also comes with a set of challenges, not just related to the intermingling of work and home life but also the shift of some of the real estate costs and costs typically associated with office-bound workers.

Benefits particularly lauded by those working remotely, are the avoidance of long commutes and of course health and safety concerns in times of pandemic.

One particular challenge for employers is the potential for employees to engage in “moonlighting”, which can be a significant concern for certain employers, especially in the technology industry. For the uninitiated, moonlighting refers to the practice of working a second job in addition to one’s primary job.

The origin of “moonlighting” dates back to the early 1800s, when it was commonly used to describe the practice of working at night by the light of the moon.

In the early 1900s, the term began to be used more broadly to refer to working a second job in addition to the primary job. Moonlighting became increasingly prevalent in the United States during the Second World War when workers were encouraged to take on additional jobs to support the war effort.

After the war, moonlighting continued to be a common practice, especially among blue-collar workers who were looking to earn extra income to support their families.

In the 1960s and 70s, moonlighting gained even more widespread acceptance as a way for employees to pursue their passions or supplement their income. However, during this time, moonlighting also became a great source of controversy, with some employers expressing concerns about conflicts of interest and decreased productivity.

With the rise of the “gig economy” in recent years, moonlighting has become even more prevalent, especially in industries like technology, where employees have in-demand skills that can be used for side projects and freelance work.

For employees, it’s a way to earn extra income or pursue their passions. For employers, it can create a conflict of interest and pose a significant perceived and actual risk to their business. In the tech industry, where employees have access to sensitive and confidential information for example, moonlighting poses the risk of unintentional or deliberate data breaches and this in turn jeopardizes a company’s reputation and introduces avoidable potential security risks.

An employee working on a project for a competing company may unintentionally share confidential information, leading to a data breach. Policies on personal use of equipment often mitigate this but things might also be said in conversations and in other work-related circumstances.

There are several reasons why tech workers may be particularly more prone to moonlighting. Firstly, the nature of their work often involves flexible hours and remote working arrangements, which can make it easier for them to take on additional work.

Secondly, the relative shortage of competent tech workers who are in high demand at a specific price point, and the skills they possess can be valuable to other companies.

From the employer’s perspective, it could be argued that there is the potential for decreased productivity, missed deadlines, and poorer quality of work as well as potential legal and previously cited reputational risks.

To mitigate the risks associated with moonlighting, employers often take contractual, policy, and control steps. Firstly, they may include moonlighting clauses in employee contracts, they may prohibit employees from taking on additional work without prior approval.

Monitoring and tracking systems may also be considered on work assigned equipment like keyboard and screen monitors to ensure that employees are not engaging in unauthorized moonlighting or behaviors. These systems not only monitor employee activity but also flag suspicious behavior, such as accessing unauthorized websites or sharing confidential information.

It’s a difficult balancing act, employees value the flexibility and freedom to pursue side projects, and a blanket ban on moonlighting can lead to increased staff turnover and decreased job satisfaction.

Employers can consider a more nuanced approach, such as allowing employees to engage in moonlighting as long as it doesn’t create a conflict of interest or compromise the company’s security though exactly how this is measured may be difficult to establish.

Complete prohibition of moonlighting altogether may seem like an easy solution but can also create some interesting disbenefits.

Employees disallowed from the pursuit of side projects or engaging in freelance work may feel very stifled and demotivated in their primary job. This may result in decreased job satisfaction and productivity, ultimately causing harm to the quality of their work and commitment to the business.

Prohibition can also lead to talent loss as employees not allowed to pursue side projects or freelance work may be more likely to seek employment elsewhere, where they have more flexibility and autonomy. Employers who prohibit moonlighting may find themselves struggling to attract and retain top talent as a result of this restrictiveness.

Side projects and freelance work can provide valuable indirect learning experiences that help employees develop new skills they can bring back to their primary job.

The prohibition of moonlighting can also create legal risks for employers. In some states and countries, laws protect employee rights to engage in lawful off-duty activities, which may include moonlighting. Employers who prohibit moonlighting without a clear and compelling reason may be at risk of legal action from employees.


Read More
Author: Uli Lokshin