Management – 🔴 Red Button Data

Apr 21 2024

To the cloud no more? That is the question.

Cloud computing has undergone a remarkable transformation over the past decade.

What was once hailed as a panacea for companies struggling with the high costs and unsustainability of on-premise IT infrastructure has now become a more nuanced and complex landscape. Businesses continue to grapple with the decision to migrate to the cloud or maintain a hybrid approach, the complexity, costs and risk are essential to understand the evolving dynamics and the potential pitfalls that lie ahead.

The initial appeal of cloud solutions was undeniable.

By offloading the burden of hardware maintenance, software updates, and data storage to cloud providers, companies could focus on their core business activities and enjoy the benefits of scalability, flexibility, and cost optimization. The cloud promised to revolutionize the way organizations managed their IT resources, allowing them to adapt quickly to changing market demands and technological advancements.

However, not all businesses have fully embraced the cloud, especially when it comes to their mission-critical systems. Companies that handle sensitive or proprietary data have often been more cautious in their approach, opting to maintain a significant portion of their operations on-premise. These organizations may have felt a sense of vindication as they watched some of their cloud-first counterparts grapple with the complexities and potential risks associated with entrusting such critical systems to third-party providers.

The recent news from Basecamp, for example, was driven by spiraling costs, irrespective of the cloud provider (they tried AWS and GCP). Thus, Basecamp decided to leave the cloud computing model and move back to on-premise infrastructure to contain costs, reduce complexity, avoid hidden costs, and retain margin. This way they felt that they had more control of the delivery and sustainment outcomes.

The Ongoing Costs of Cloud-First Strategies

Cloud bills, for example, can comprise hundreds of millions or billions of rows of data, making them difficult to analyze in traditional tools like Excel and cloud computing reduces upfront startup costs, including setup and maintenance costs, with 94% of IT professionals reporting this benefit. Accenture for example, found cloud migration leads to 30-40% Total Cost of Ownership (TCO) savings.

As many as 60% of C-suite executives also cite security as the top benefit of cloud computing, ahead of cost savings, scalability, ease of maintenance, and speed.

The private cloud services market for example, is projected to experience significant growth in the coming years. According to Technavio, the global private cloud services market size is expected to grow by $276.36 billion from 2022 to 2027, at a CAGR of 26.71%.

The cloud of course supports automation, reducing the risk of human errors that cause security breaches and accoridnly the platforms help capture the cost of tagged, untagged, and untaggable cloud resources, as well as allocate 100% of shared costs. For those organizations that have wholeheartedly adopted a cloud-first strategy, the operational budgets for cloud technologies have often continued to climb year-over-year.

Instead of fully capitalizing on the advances in cloud technology, these companies may find themselves having to maintain or even grow their cost base to take advantage of the latest offerings. The promise of cost savings and operational efficiency that initially drew them to the cloud may not have materialized as expected.

As this cloud landscape continues to evolve, a critical question arises: is there a breaking point where cloud solutions may become unviable for all but the smallest or most virtualized cloud-interwoven businesses?

This concern is particularly relevant in the context of customer data management, where the increasing number of bad actors and risk vectors, coupled with the growing web of regulations and restrictions at local, regional, and international levels, can contribute to a sense of unease about entrusting sensitive customer data to cloud environments.

The Evolving Regulatory Landscape & Cyber threats

The proliferation of data privacy regulations, such as the General Data Protection Regulation (GDPR) in Europe and the California Consumer Privacy Act (CCPA) in the United States, has added a new layer of complexity to the cloud adoption equation.

These regulations, along with a growing number of industry-specific compliance requirements, have placed significant demands on organizations to ensure the security and privacy of the data they handle, regardless of where it is stored or processed.For businesses operating in multiple jurisdictions, navigating the web of regulations can be a daunting task, as the requirements and restrictions can vary widely across different regions.

Failure to comply with these regulations can result in hefty fines, reputational damage, and even legal consequences, making the decision to entrust sensitive data to cloud providers a high-stakes proposition.

Alongside the evolving regulatory landscape, the threat of cyber attacks has also intensified, with bad actors constantly seeking new vulnerabilities to exploit.

Cloud environments, while offering robust security measures, are not immune to these threats, and the potential for data breaches or system compromises can have devastating consequences for businesses and their customers.

The growing sophistication of cyber attacks, coupled with the increasing value of customer data, has heightened the need for robust security measures and comprehensive risk management strategies. Companies must carefully evaluate the security protocols and safeguards offered by cloud providers, as well as their own internal security practices, to ensure the protection of their most valuable assets.

Balancing Innovation and Risk Management

In light of these challenges, many businesses are exploring hybrid approaches that combine on-premise and cloud-based solutions.

This strategy allows organizations to maintain control over their mission-critical systems and sensitive data, while still leveraging the benefits of cloud computing for less sensitive or more scalable workloads.

Some companies are also taking a more selective approach to cloud adoption, carefully evaluating which workloads and data sets are suitable for cloud migration.

By adopting a risk-based approach, they can balance the potential benefits of cloud solutions with the need to maintain a high level of control and security over their most critical assets.

As the cloud landscape continues to evolve, it is essential for businesses to carefully evaluate their cloud strategies and adapt them to the changing circumstances.

This may involve regularly reviewing their cloud usage, cost optimization strategies, and the evolving regulatory and security landscape to ensure that their cloud solutions remain aligned with their business objectives and risk tolerance.Regular monitoring and assessment of cloud performance, cost-effectiveness, and security posture can help organizations identify areas for improvement and make informed decisions about their cloud investments.

Collaboration with cloud providers and industry experts can also provide valuable insights and best practices to navigate the complexities of the cloud ecosystem.

As the cloud landscape continues to evolve, it is clear that the path forward will not be a one-size-fits-all solution.

Businesses must be careful in weighing the potential benefits of cloud adoption against the risks and challenges that come with entrusting their critical data and systems to third-party providers.The future of cloud solutions will likely involve a more nuanced and balanced approach, where organizations leverage the power of cloud computing selectively and strategically, while maintaining a strong focus on data security, regulatory compliance, and risk management.

Collaboration between businesses, cloud providers, and regulatory bodies will likely be crucial in shaping the next chapter of the cloud revolution, ensuring that the benefits of cloud technology are realized in a secure and sustainable manner.

Inspiring Others: The Art of Transforming Passion into Shared Vision

Leaders are often driven by a deep, unwavering passion for their cause, political position, product, or objective.

This dedication can be a powerful force, fuelling determination and propelling them towards their goals. However, this very passion can also become a source of frustration when others fail to share the same level of enthusiasm.

It can be disheartening for leaders when employees are not as excited about new initiatives, when family members do not fully support their efforts, or when outsiders seem disinterested in engaging with the leader’s agenda.

Such a lack of shared passion can leave the leader feeling alone, angry, misunderstood, and under-appreciated. While it is tempting to argue, debate, or pressure others into aligning with one’s vision, this approach often proves counterproductive.

Overcoming this frustration lies in the one’s ability to inspire others, rather than simply asserting their own desires. Inspiring leaders understand that the most effective way to achieve their goals is to focus on what others want, rather than solely on their own agenda.

By explaining one’s passion in the language and perspective of those you seek to influence, you can create a shared vision that resonates with the needs and desires of your audience.

Connecting the collective’s needs and dsires

One of the hallmarks of an inspiring leader is often their ability to shift the conversation focus from themselves to that of the collective.

Instead of simply extolling the virtues of their own position or product, they take the time to understand the needs, concerns, and aspirations of those they wish to engage. In the absence of this, you have tghe master-serf relationship where employees in particular are just wage-slaves; or in clubs or societies where the leader is the prophet and the others are just acolytes or disciples.

By doing so, a leader can craft a narrative that speaks directly to the interests and motivations of those around them; but it needs to be grounded in everyone’s reality.

“The more scarce and valuable commodity is cold-shower-self-honesty”

Joel Runyon

Rather than relying just on passion alone, inspiring leaders are willing to step back and critically examine their own circumstances, their assumptions, biases, and communication strategies. They recognize that their personal enthusiasm, while genuine, may not be enough to sway others who have different priorities and perspectives.

The Shared Vision

By focusing on the needs and desires of the team, an inspiring leader is able to craft a shared vision that aligns with the goals and personal and collective aspirations of those around them.

This shared vision becomes a powerful tool for overcoming the frustration that can arise when others do not immediately embrace the leader’s passion.Rather than simply pushing their own agenda, inspiring leaders take the time to understand what motivates their employees, family members, or external stakeholders. They then weave these insights into a narrative that highlights how the leader’s vision can help others achieve their own objectives.

Such an approach creates a sense of mutual investment and shared purpose, fostering a collaborative environment where everyone feels invested in the success of the endeavor.

Empathy and Emotional Connection

Inspiring leaders often understand that passion alone is not enough to drive meaningful change.

Recognizing the importance of empathy and emotional connection in engaging others and cultivating a shared vision, they actively listen to the concerns and perspectives of others, they are able to tailor their message in a way that resonates on a deeper level.

An emotional connection is crucial in overcoming the frustration that can arise when others do not immediately share the same passion. By demonstrating a genuine understanding of the challenges and aspirations of their audience, inspiring leaders are able to build trust and foster a sense of shared purpose. This, in turn, helps to overcome resistance and create a collaborative environment for all.

The Art of Inspiration

Inspiring leaders understand that the role is not to simply assert their own desires, but to create a compelling vision that aligns with the needs and aspirations of those they seek to influence.

This requires a delicate balance of passion, empathy, and strategic communication.

A focus on “them” speaks directly to the concerns and motivations of others. The most valuable commodity is not just passion, but the willingness to engage in that “cold-shower-self-honesty” – critically examining own assumptions, biases, and communication strategies.

A process of self-reflection and audience-centric communication, inspiring leaders are able to overcome the frustration that can arise when others do not immediately share their passion and potential impatience.

A shared vision that resonates with the needs and desires of their audience fosters collaborative environment where everyone feels invested in the success of the endeavor.

Ultimately, the art of inspiration is not about forcing others to conform to the leader’s agenda, but about cultivating a shared sense of purpose and mutual investment and having everyone else naturally come together on the journey of exploration, discovery and execution. Only through connecting with the needs and desires of others, inspiring leaders are able to achieve greater success and create lasting change.

The Impact of Artificial Intelligence on Business Operations

Artificial Intelligence (AI), today more than ever before, stands out as a transformative force reshaping the way businesses operate.

Like all modern technologies, it has infiltrated many aspects of business, enhancing efficiency, improving customer experiences, and driving innovation. It’s touch, is felt from customer service to data analytics.

AI is revolutionizing traditional approaches and propelling organizations into a new era of possibilities but it is challenged by concerns about bias, transparency and its ability to hallucinate.

Some history

The Turing Test, proposed by British mathematician, computer scientist and codebreaker Alan Turing in 1950, was considered a measure of a machine’s ability to exhibit intelligent behavior indistinguishable from that of a human.

The test serves as a rudimentary benchmark for assessing a machine’s capability to display human-like intelligence in natural language conversation but the latest developments with Large Language Models (LLMs) and how they naively behave may have most broken the fundamentals of this test and we may need to think of new ways to assess AI.

The basic premise of the Turing Test is to assess a machine’s ability to engage in human-like conversation, that’s still relevant, but its applicability and limitations have become more pronounced in the context of LLMs. LLMs don’t actually understand what you’re saying or asking.

Despite all this, one of the most significant impacts of AI on business operations is evident in customer service. The very space where we want a conversation, may be better served by an AI.

Chatterbots

The reason may be quite simple. We’re not actually looking for a social conversation with an AI when we use a chatbot or a virtual assistant, instead we’re looking for information, or answers to solve the thing that has brought us to the chatbot in the first place.

The first “chatterbot” is reputed to be ELIZA, created in the mid-1960s by Joseph Weizenbaum, a computer scientist at the Massachusetts Institute of Technology (MIT).

ELIZA operated by processing user responses to supplied prompts and generating pre-defined, contextually appropriate replies.

Using a combination of pattern matching and simple keyword recognition techniques it simulated a Rogerian psychotherapist.

Although the interactions were relatively basic, ELIZA’s ability to mimic human conversation and provide responses that seemed meaningful and engaging was groundbreaking at the time.

If you’re interested, there is a javascript version of ELIZA originally written by Michal Wallace and significantly enhanced by George Dunlop that you can try out at the CSU Fullerton Psychology Department.

When applications are integrated with NLP capabilities, the application “understands” and processes human language. This feature can be part of augmentation of chatbots and virtual assistants and facilitates interactions with customers, employees, and others. Chatbots and virtual assistants powered by AI-driven RPA can engage in natural language conversations, answer queries, and provide assistance, enhancing customer service and user experience.

AI-powered chatbots and virtual assistants have come a long way and are just starting to revolutionize the way businesses interact with their customers. With instant responses to customer queries, personalized recommendations, routine task handling, they can ensure a relatively seamless customer experience.

The process robots are coming

An area I have dipped in and out of at various points in my work career since Y2K, is robotic process automation (RPA). The goal of the RPA being to automate mundane and repetitive tasks. Tasks that were previously low value and time-consuming for employees. Early RPAs were very prescriptive and simplistically programmed but today they are amore adaptive. One of the earliest examples of RPA-like automation can be traced back to the introduction of screen scraping software in the 1990s.

AI-driven RPA goes beyond basic task automation by incorporating so called cognitive capabilities. With machine learning (ML) algorithms, RPA systems can analyze vast amounts of data, recognize patterns, and make decisions based on historical and real-time information. This “cognitive” automation allows businesses to automate complex tasks that require decision-making, such as data analysis, customer service interactions, and fraud detection.

AI in fraud detection, risk management, and algorithmic trading has machine learning algorithms analyze financial data in real-time, identifying unusual patterns and potential bad actor activities, thereby enhancing security and minimizing financial losses.

RPA integrated with AI can excel in processing unstructured data, such as invoices, forms, and emails. Through Optical Character Recognition (OCR) and machine learning, such systems can extract relevant information from documents more accurately than people and faster! This capability streamlines document-based processes, such as invoice processing and claims management, reducing manual errors and improving overall document handling efficiency.

Automation liberates human resources, allowing employees to focus on more strategic and creative aspects of their roles; the kinds of applications include dataentry, invoice processing, and report generation are now handled efficiently by AI-driven systems, leading to higher productivity and reduced operational costs.

Smart reporting

AI has been transforming data analysis for a while now, by enabling businesses to glean improved insights from vast datasets.

Machine learning algorithms analyze historical data, identify patterns, and predict future trends with remarkable accuracy. This predictive analytics can help a business make better informed decisions, optimize inventory practices, more precisely forecast customer demands, and enhance overall operational efficiency.

AI-driven applications optimizing supply chain operations look to historical sales data, market trends, and weather patterns, for example, to predict demand more accurately.

This multi-threaded predictive capability aids businesses in avoiding stock-outs, reducing inventory holdings, and minimizing waste. AI-powered algorithms are also used to optimize route planning and delivery scheduling, which can all improve the effectiveness and cost profile of logistics operations.

By combining data analytics with AI, businesses automate their data analysis and generate more precise actionable insights. AI-driven analytics systems process vast datasets, identify trends, and provide answers in near real-time. Decision-makers now have timely and accurate information, enabling them to make better informed choices to drive business growth and innovation.

More business focus areas

The examples cited above are probably the areas I have seen benefits more commonly from AI in the business setting, but there are at least almost a dozen more that can be considered.

AI algorithms that analyze customer behavior and preferences, enable businesses to create highly targeted marketing campaigns. The campaigns might include personalized recommendations, content, and advertisements to enhance customer engagement and increase conversion rates.

Healthcare professionals have started to consider the use of AI in diagnosing diseases, analyzing medical images, and predicting patient outcomes. Machine learning algorithms can process vast amounts of medical data, leading to more accurate diagnoses and personalized treatment plans.

Analysing medical images, such as X-rays, CT scans, MRIs, lab slides and mammograms, AI, can process these artefacts at speeds much faster than human medical professionals. Algorithms can quickly identify patterns, anomalies, and potential areas of concern.

Subtle changes in medical images that might not be immediately apparent to human eyes are more easily indetified by AI. This early detection can lead to the diagnosis of diseases at their nascent stages, improving the chances of successful treatment and recovery. This is particularly crucial in diseases like cancer, where early detection significantly improves patient outcomes. In critical cases, rapid analysis can be life-saving.

Intelligent tutoring and educational systems adapt to learner styles, providing customized educational content and feedback. AI also aids in automating the administrative tasks for educational institutions, improving efficiency.

In manufacturing and operations, the use of AI can assist businesses in anticipating equipment failures, reducing downtime and maintenance costs.

In talent acquisition processes, automating resume screening, candidate matching, and even conducting initial interviews can accelerate candidate evaluation. Chatbots powered by AI handle the routine HR inquiries, HR professionals focus on more strategic and higher value tasks like employee engagement and development.

AI is employed in environmental monitoring and conservation efforts to predict natural disasters, monitor pollution levels, and aid in wildlife conservation, contributing to more effective environmental preservation strategies.

Legal assistance tools that are AI-powered can help legal professionals in document review, contract analysis, and legal research. Natural Language Processing algorithms enable these tools to process and analyze large volumes of legal documents efficiently, improving accuracy and saving time for lawyers and paralegals.

Artificial Intelligence (AI) has become a transformative force revolutionizing various aspects of business operations. From customer service to data analytics.

AI-driven technologies have significantly enhanced efficiency, improved customer experiences, and driven innovation across diverse sectors.

However, the rapid integration of AI in business processes has raised concerns regarding bias, transparency, and the ability of AI systems to comprehend human-like conversations, especially in the context of Large Language Models (LLMs).

The traditional Turing Test, once a benchmark for assessing machine intelligence, now faces challenges due to the complex behavior of LLMs, prompting the need for new evaluation methods.

Despite these challenges, AI-powered chatbots and virtual assistants have reshaped customer interactions, providing instant responses and personalized recommendations, thereby ensuring seamless customer experiences. AI-driven Robotic Process Automation (RPA) has automated mundane tasks, liberating human resources and enabling employees to focus on strategic and creative aspects of their roles.

AI has revolutionized data analysis, supply chain optimization, healthcare diagnostics, education, talent acquisition, environmental monitoring, and legal assistance, showcasing its vast potential in diverse business focus areas.

As businesses continue to harness the power of AI, it is imperative to address the ethical concerns and develop innovative solutions, ensuring that AI remains a valuable asset in shaping the future of business operations.

Nurturing a Culture of Empowerment for Innovation in Business Leadership

In my view, effective leadership involves empowering employees and fostering a culture of innovation amongst teams. This is particularly important in industry sectors that are bound up in imprecise ways to achieve both specific and vaguely specified outcomes. These may include technology and software development, entertainment and media, fashion and design, advertising and marketing, renewable energy, and sustainability.

The concept of autonomous yet thoughtful decision-making is a powerful leadership strategy that helps to drive desired productive outcomes. Many may understand the significance of autonomy and empowerment but not acknowledge the importance in various business settings.

This often means emphasizing the need for a shift away from very traditional command and control models (C&C). C&C is prevalent in more traditional and bureaucratic organizations it has often been associated with industries where standardization, efficiency, and compliance were crucial, such as military, manufacturing, and certain government sectors.

Some of the key characteristics of C&C include centralized decision-making where the decision-making power is concentrated in the hands of those at the top. This approach often leaves little room for input from the lower levels of employees. There’s a chain of command and decisions are typically passed down that chain.

A second common characteristic is the strictness of the hierarchy. Organizationally the structure is typically like a pyramid with clearly delineated lines of authority and control. Each level reports to the one above it, and instructions flow from the top down. There may be an emphasis on discipline and control to ensure that employees adhere to prescribed and somewhat predictable processes in order to meet performance expectations.

C&C is often characterized by rigid adherence to rules, procedures, and protocols. Employees are expected to follow specific guidelines as prescribed without deviation. In line with the pyramid, communication follows formal channels, such as through managers and supervisors and information or insights may be limited as the communication slows up and down the hierarchy. Everyone is assigned specific roles and responsibilities, and tasks are somewhat clearly defined. Employees have little autonomy to make decisions or exercise creativity. The focus is on carrying out assigned tasks as directed.

While this leadership model can be effective in certain circumstances as I previously described, it is often criticized for its limitations in an ambiguous, dynamic, and fluid business environment.

In industries that require adaptability, creativity, and innovation, like the tech sector, the command and control model in my experience, actually hinders employee engagement, limits the flow of ideas, and inhibits organizational agility. I am more in favor of participative and collaborative leadership that empowers employees and fosters a culture of innovation and a genuine desire for ownership and accountability.

Instead, I advocate for a more informal and relaxed, and collaborative leadership approach that encourages creativity and innovation where the leadership team functions as player-coaches and builds genuine consensus and collective agreement on big and small decisions through dialog and negotiation.

Growth through empowerment

If you want growth, then empowering employees goes beyond simple delegation; it requires trusting individuals to make informed decisions and providing them with the necessary resources and autonomy to act. In so doing you foster a sense of ownership and accountability within the workforce which then leads to higher job satisfaction and improved overall productivity.

The core of successful empowerment lies in striking the right balance between autonomy and thoughtful decision-making. You should want autonomous yet well-considered decision-making from your employees. Autonomy allows teams and individuals to leverage their expertise and creativity to address complex challenges effectively. However, it must be complemented with considered decision-making, where employees gather information, seek advice, and analyze potential outcomes before acting. Remember you’re paying these people for their expertise and to perform a particular job. If you’re only interested in barking instructions at them then you may as well just hire unskilled people with no particular specialisms or experience.

Tailoring empowerment models to your business settings is important since the universal benefits of empowerment and autonomy don’t necessarily manifest in all cultures or work settings. The application should therefore be tailored to suit the specific business contexts you have. There are a few different implementation models to consider. Task-based, Team-based, and Individualized

Task-based empowerment is typical for industries with routine tasks. Task-based empowerment can streamline processes and enhance productivity. By granting employees authority over specific responsibilities, business leaders enable them to make decisions related to their assigned tasks, boosting efficiency. Without disrupting efficiency and effectiveness, for example, employees can rotate and resequence their tasking according to their preferences and observed optimality.

Team-based empowerment is most appropriate in dynamic environments which ultimately benefit from improved collaboration and collective decision-making and where these activities take center stage. By allowing teams to pool diverse perspectives and expertise, leaders have the potential to tap into the opportunities afforded by collective innovation.

In roles requiring specialized skills, individual-based empowerment can be highly effective. Leaders empower subject matter experts to make decisions in their areas according to proficiency, fostering innovation and excellence in technology-driven fields. This is individual-based empowerment

C&C with its centralized decision-making and strict protocols works somewhat well in highly regulated industries, this approach stifles creativity though and limits adaptability in technology development. Employees may feel restricted, resulting in decreased motivation, innovation, and engagement.

Conversely, the informal and relaxed leadership style promotes open communication, trust, and collaboration. By empowering employees to make autonomous decisions, leadership fosters an essential culture of innovation and agility. This approach is particularly effective in software development and technology-driven operations, where creativity thrives in a flexible environment.

Getting the best out of teams and individuals

Getting the best out of the two quite different approaches still requires you to set clear objectives with agreed measurable outcomes. Empowering employees requires providing clear objectives and expectations. Well-defined goals using the SMART framework (Specific, Measurable, Achievable, Relevant, Time-bound) help individuals self-manage their work efficiently.

Another facet is effective time management; autonomy allows individuals to manage their own time. To be effective though, there needs to be discipline. Discipline is essential for ensuring its effective use. Encouraging employees to prioritize tasks, set deadlines, and avoid distractions maintains their productivity.

Autonomous employees must also be accountable for their work. Encouraging ownership and transparent progress reporting foster a sense of responsibility.

Self-Management in Project and Program Management

In technology development, adopting an agile methodology enhances self-management. Empowered teams self-organize, collaborate, and make quick decisions to adapt to changing requirements effectively.

Leaders can further empower teams by providing autonomy in decision-making. Open communication and input from team members drive a self-managed and collaborative environment.

Project management itself involves ongoing learning and improvement allowing employees to reflect on progress and take initiative. These empowering approaches support positive change and have a greater likelihood of driving success.

As already suggested, empowerment also requires balancing discipline with flexibility. Through research, it has been found that Innovation thrives in more flexible environments. Leaders must therefore be open to diverse methods and ideas, trusting teams to find effective solutions. Open channels of communication facilitate not only bidirectional trust, they also support employee self-management and lead to continuous improvement.

A few words of caution

Sometimes, in our earnest efforts to empower others and provide autonomy, we may inadvertently deceive ourselves into believing that we have relinquished command and control.

Despite statements of intent, the empowerment we claim to have granted is a self-deceiving illusion. We might unknowingly perpetuate a micro-management overreach by behaving in exactly the opposite way to what we suggest we are thinking. This can occur when we continuously bombard teams with questions, second-guess their independent decisions, and challenge their judgment with frequency. Individuals and teams need to occasionally fail to learn. While our intention may be to offer support and ensure success, our actions may inadvertently stifle creativity and autonomy.

True empowerment necessitates trust and allowing individuals the space to take ownership of their work is critical. Constantly questioning decisions sends mixed signals, who is actually making the decisions? Undermining the confidence of team leads and team members impedes their ability to innovate freely. To genuinely empower others, we must genuinely let go of control, offer guidance only when sought, celebrate their success, recognize missteps, and offer encouragement, coaching, and reassurance.

Occasional mistakes are part of the learning process. By fostering a culture of trust and granting autonomy, we can break free from the C&C mindset, unleashing the full potential of our teams to drive creativity and achieve remarkable results.

Nurturing a culture of empowerment is essential for fostering innovation in business leadership. By tailoring empowerment models to the specifics of the business setting and adopting informal leadership styles, leaders can cultivate creativity and adaptability, particularly in software development and technology-driven operations. Encouraging discipline and self-management in tasking and project and program management enables employees to thrive in an environment that values autonomy while maintaining focus and efficiency. Striking the right balance between discipline and flexibility empowers teams to innovate, drive success, and contribute to sustainable growth.

The “on the side” hustlers

In recent years, the trend of remote work has gained popularity, especially in the technology industry.

The advent of modern technology has seen certain kinds of employees no longer being required to be physically present in an office to perform their job functions.

This flexibility is praised by many as having benefits but also comes with a set of challenges, not just related to the intermingling of work and home life but also the shift of some of the real estate costs and costs typically associated with office-bound workers.

Benefits particularly lauded by those working remotely, are the avoidance of long commutes and of course health and safety concerns in times of pandemic.

One particular challenge for employers is the potential for employees to engage in “moonlighting”, which can be a significant concern for certain employers, especially in the technology industry. For the uninitiated, moonlighting refers to the practice of working a second job in addition to one’s primary job.

The origin of “moonlighting” dates back to the early 1800s, when it was commonly used to describe the practice of working at night by the light of the moon.

In the early 1900s, the term began to be used more broadly to refer to working a second job in addition to the primary job. Moonlighting became increasingly prevalent in the United States during the Second World War when workers were encouraged to take on additional jobs to support the war effort.

After the war, moonlighting continued to be a common practice, especially among blue-collar workers who were looking to earn extra income to support their families.

In the 1960s and 70s, moonlighting gained even more widespread acceptance as a way for employees to pursue their passions or supplement their income. However, during this time, moonlighting also became a great source of controversy, with some employers expressing concerns about conflicts of interest and decreased productivity.

With the rise of the “gig economy” in recent years, moonlighting has become even more prevalent, especially in industries like technology, where employees have in-demand skills that can be used for side projects and freelance work.

For employees, it’s a way to earn extra income or pursue their passions. For employers, it can create a conflict of interest and pose a significant perceived and actual risk to their business. In the tech industry, where employees have access to sensitive and confidential information for example, moonlighting poses the risk of unintentional or deliberate data breaches and this in turn jeopardizes a company’s reputation and introduces avoidable potential security risks.

An employee working on a project for a competing company may unintentionally share confidential information, leading to a data breach. Policies on personal use of equipment often mitigate this but things might also be said in conversations and in other work-related circumstances.

There are several reasons why tech workers may be particularly more prone to moonlighting. Firstly, the nature of their work often involves flexible hours and remote working arrangements, which can make it easier for them to take on additional work.

Secondly, the relative shortage of competent tech workers who are in high demand at a specific price point, and the skills they possess can be valuable to other companies.

From the employer’s perspective, it could be argued that there is the potential for decreased productivity, missed deadlines, and poorer quality of work as well as potential legal and previously cited reputational risks.

To mitigate the risks associated with moonlighting, employers often take contractual, policy, and control steps. Firstly, they may include moonlighting clauses in employee contracts, they may prohibit employees from taking on additional work without prior approval.

Monitoring and tracking systems may also be considered on work assigned equipment like keyboard and screen monitors to ensure that employees are not engaging in unauthorized moonlighting or behaviors. These systems not only monitor employee activity but also flag suspicious behavior, such as accessing unauthorized websites or sharing confidential information.

It’s a difficult balancing act, employees value the flexibility and freedom to pursue side projects, and a blanket ban on moonlighting can lead to increased staff turnover and decreased job satisfaction.

Employers can consider a more nuanced approach, such as allowing employees to engage in moonlighting as long as it doesn’t create a conflict of interest or compromise the company’s security though exactly how this is measured may be difficult to establish.

Complete prohibition of moonlighting altogether may seem like an easy solution but can also create some interesting disbenefits.

Employees disallowed from the pursuit of side projects or engaging in freelance work may feel very stifled and demotivated in their primary job. This may result in decreased job satisfaction and productivity, ultimately causing harm to the quality of their work and commitment to the business.

Prohibition can also lead to talent loss as employees not allowed to pursue side projects or freelance work may be more likely to seek employment elsewhere, where they have more flexibility and autonomy. Employers who prohibit moonlighting may find themselves struggling to attract and retain top talent as a result of this restrictiveness.

Side projects and freelance work can provide valuable indirect learning experiences that help employees develop new skills they can bring back to their primary job.

The prohibition of moonlighting can also create legal risks for employers. In some states and countries, laws protect employee rights to engage in lawful off-duty activities, which may include moonlighting. Employers who prohibit moonlighting without a clear and compelling reason may be at risk of legal action from employees.

Playing at work

It has been a while since a colleague raised their eyebrows at me and my light-hearted disposition to work. But make no mistake, work itself is serious stuff but it doesn’t have to be boring and dull if you tackle it with the right mindset.

The idea that work should be considered as play might seem counterintuitive at first glance. We typically associate play with leisure and work with productivity and output. However, there are many compelling reasons to consider work as play, and doing so can lead to a more enjoyable and fulfilling work experience.

When we think of play, we think of activities that we enjoy and look forward to doing; the same can be true for work if we approach it with a positive mindset. By finding ways to make work enjoyable and engaging, we can change our perception of work from something that we have to do to something that we really want to do.

Albert Einstein is often quoted as saying, “Play is the highest form of research.” This statement suggests that Einstein believed that play was not only enjoyable but also an important part of the learning and discovery process. Einstein also believed that work and play were not mutually exclusive, and that one could approach work with a playful and creative mindset.

In addition to his famous quote, Einstein also wrote about the importance of play in his personal life. He enjoyed playing the violin, sailing, and hiking, and he often credited his hobbies with helping him to think creatively and come up with new ideas. Einstein believed that play was a way to stimulate the imagination and that it could lead to new insights and discoveries.

Play is also often associated with creativity and innovation; when we engage in play, we are more likely to experiment and try new things, which can lead to new ideas and insights. Similarly, when we approach work with a playful mindset, we are more likely to come up with creative solutions to problems and find new ways to approach complex and simple tasks.

Play fosters intrinsic motivation such that when we engage in play, we do it because we enjoy it, not because we expect to get a reward or avoid punishment. Similarly, when we approach work as play, we are more likely to be intrinsically motivated to do our best possible work. We are not just working for a paycheck or promotion, but because we enjoy the work itself.

Many considered play a social activity, one that can help build relationships and foster a sense of community. Similarly, when we approach work with a playful mindset, we are more likely to build positive relationships with our colleagues and enjoy working together. This can lead to a more supportive and collaborative work environment.

Play is a great way to reduce stress and promote relaxation, many a keen sportsman will take to the golf course or the outdoors to destress. Similarly, when we approach work with a playful mindset, we are more likely to feel less stressed and more relaxed. This can lead to a more positive work environment and improved overall well-being.

There are many reasons why work should be considered play.

By finding ways to make work enjoyable and engaging, we can approach work with a positive mindset and enjoy the work itself.

Approaching work as play can foster creativity, build relationships, reduce stress, and promote intrinsic motivation.

As we spend a significant portion of our lives at work, it is essential to find ways to make work more enjoyable and fulfilling. By considering work as play, we can achieve this and create a more positive and productive work experience.

You can’t work from home

While the rise of remote work and hybrid working models have made it possible for many employees to work from home, there are still some types of work that are not suitable for remote work.

Some jobs require specific equipment or tools that are not easily accessible outside of the workplace, while others require close collaboration and communication with colleagues.

Some jobs require specialized equipment, such as manufacturing or laboratory work, which cannot be easily transported or replicated in a home environment.

For example, a chemical engineer who works in a lab may require access to specific materials and tools that are not available at home, making it impossible to work remotely.

Some jobs require a physical presence, such as those in the hospitality or healthcare industries. For example, a nurse cannot provide care to patients from home, and a restaurant worker cannot prepare and serve food remotely.

Some jobs require frequent face-to-face interaction, such as those in sales or customer service. For example, a salesperson may need to visit clients in person, and a customer service representative may need to speak with customers directly to address their concerns.

Some jobs require close collaboration and communication with colleagues, such as those in research and development or project management. For example, a team of engineers working on a new product may need to work together in person to share ideas, troubleshoot problems, and make decisions.

Client-facing interactions jobs, such as those in the legal or financial industries may preclude working from home. For example, a lawyer may need to meet with clients in person to discuss legal matters, and a financial advisor may need to provide advice to clients face-to-face.

There is also a class of jobs that require on-site supervision. These jobs require on-site supervision, such as those in construction or manufacturing. For example, a construction worker needs to be supervised by a manager who can oversee the work and ensure that it is done safely and effectively.

While remote work and hybrid working models have made it possible for many employees to work from home, there are still some types of work that are not suitable for remote work.

Jobs that require specialized equipment, physical presence, frequent face-to-face interaction, team collaboration, client-facing interaction, and on-site supervision are among the types of work that are not suitable for working from home.

Organizations need to assess the requirements of each job role and determine whether it can be done remotely, on-site, or in a hybrid model to ensure that employees can work effectively and efficiently.

🔴 Red Button Data